The issue at hand is that we are, as the Anglican Church of Canada, facing schism over the issue of same sex unions (blessings) and homosexuality.
Today in our Eucharistic Gospel we are faced with John asking Jesus who will betray the Lord. Jesus points to Judas through the giving of both wine and bread, in a similar fashion to communion. John and the disciples are completely unaware of Judas’ deceit.
I said today in my sermon, Judas is often made out to be the villain from the very beginning of Jesus’ ministry (most modern movies and art throughout the ages), but here those who know him the most are unaware and obviously enjoying his company. He is not evil incarnate, he for the moment allows Satan to corrupt him and sells out. Jesus knows that he is the one to betray him, yet he is still welcome at the table. He is a member of the body, he is still open to being received. Judas’ response after the betrayal is to take his life, but would not the Lord receive him just as he received Peter, who denied him 3 times?
Why preface this reflection with our current 21st century problem? Can anything be worse than denying the Lord? It is a sin of the Spirit! Peter denying Jesus is very much a denial of the Christ, yet still he is received into Christ’s loving arms after the resurrection. Is homosexuality comparable? No, in no way. It is not a matter of the spirit but of the flesh; that which we are forgiven for, as did Jesus with the woman at the well and the woman caught in adultery. We are all sinners of the flesh. Judas betrayed Jesus, Peter denied Jesus, Homosexual Christians do neither, apart from what any person does in our current redeemed yet sinful nature.
The point is that at the end of this Gospel pericope, the Lord tells the community to love their neighbor. That the true mark of Christ: Love. By our love we are then really ambassadors of Christ, and seen to be as such. So to place it in perspective here we have the story of betrayal, the ultimate betrayal, and it is followed by receiving all as loved and welcome. Judas receives communion, the image for John’s community at the turn of the century when this Gospel was written would clearly indicate a Eucharistic experience in the reception of bread and wine. Thus no matter the sin, nor the separation, receiving the Eucharist, being part of the Body of Christ, is more important than the sin: all are welcome equally (see 1 Cor. for problems with Christian hierarchy). The person is more important than the "falling short".
In our church we are casting off people as sinful, a particular people without pointing our fingers at others, and thus we disenfranchise them from the Body of Christ. That has to be worse when examining Jesus’ demand in this particular reading, with the image of ultimate sin. We must mark ourselves as lovers of the sinful, all sinners; while of course hating Satan’s grip which leads us astray… the acts of sin, as happened with Judas and Peter. Judas could not believe in redemption or forgiveness, the other, though devastated, ran to the empty tomb to greet his Lord. Peter knew he would be received, Judas was filled with doubt and shame... exactly what Satan wants us to feel about ourselves!!!
If we say the mark of Christ is love then we must name sin, yet not force sinners to choose Judas’ way (whether real or metaphorical). Our church must be open and accepting, of course we still need to name sin and call it out, but breaking communion and the bond of love is worse, for we place stumbling blocks before others (Matt 16:23; Rom 14:13; 1 Cor 8:9 & 2 Cor 6:3).
I am mortified by the actions of some of our Communion’s Primates during their recent meeting where they broke communion by not attending the Eucharist: (http://www.toronto.anglican.ca/index.asp?navid=78&fid3=368&layid=18&fid2=-88).
Jesus says,
A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.
(niv, John 13:34-35)
Breaking away from receiving the sacrament, together as the Body of Christ, especially the leaders of the church, is horrific and has nothing to do with this direction Christ gives us at the very moments he deals with those who will deny him. We can not ignore it, withdrawl from the Lord's Table, is just as bad as what Judas did, and denying a person from the Lord's Table is worse for the one who denys others.
This should make us think; this should make us pray!
D+